================
@@ -0,0 +1,535 @@
+//===-- RPCCommon.cpp 
-----------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM 
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "RPCCommon.h"
+
+#include "clang/AST/AST.h"
+#include "clang/AST/Mangle.h"
+#include "clang/Lex/Lexer.h"
+
+#include "llvm/ADT/StringExtras.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/StringMap.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/StringRef.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
+
+using namespace clang;
+
+// We intentionally do not generate some classes because they are currently
+// inconvenient, they aren't really used by most consumers, or we're not sure
+// why they exist.
+static constexpr llvm::StringRef DisallowedClasses[] = {
+    "SBCommunication",          // What is this used for?
+    "SBInputReader",            // What is this used for?
+    "SBCommandPluginInterface", // This is hard to support, we can do it if
+                                // really needed though.
+    "SBCommand", // There's nothing too difficult about this one, but many of
+                 // its methods take a SBCommandPluginInterface pointer so
+                 // there's no reason to support this.
+};
+
+// We intentionally avoid generating certain methods either because they are
+// difficult to support correctly or they aren't really used much from C++.
+// FIXME: We should be able to annotate these methods instead of maintaining a
+// list in the generator itself.
+static constexpr llvm::StringRef DisallowedMethods[] = {
+    // The threading functionality in SBHostOS is deprecated and thus we do not
+    // generate them. It would be ideal to add the annotations to the methods
+    // and then support not generating deprecated methods. However, without
+    // annotations the generator generates most things correctly. This one is
+    // problematic because it returns a pointer to an "opaque" structure
+    // (thread_t) that is not `void *`, so special casing it is more effort 
than
+    // it's worth.
+    "_ZN4lldb8SBHostOS10ThreadJoinEP17_opaque_pthread_tPPvPNS_7SBErrorE",
+    "_ZN4lldb8SBHostOS12ThreadCancelEP17_opaque_pthread_tPNS_7SBErrorE",
+    "_ZN4lldb8SBHostOS12ThreadCreateEPKcPFPvS3_ES3_PNS_7SBErrorE",
+    "_ZN4lldb8SBHostOS12ThreadDetachEP17_opaque_pthread_tPNS_7SBErrorE",
+    "_ZN4lldb8SBHostOS13ThreadCreatedEPKc",
----------------
DavidSpickett wrote:

All these mangled names, is the mangling stable and how stable across compilers 
and platforms? Is GCC on Linux going to give different results for example?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136748
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to