jimingham wrote: > > If this result printing callback was also passed the command string (which > > it has from just above where the callback is called) then this would also > > be an easy way to do logging of command execution. That's not needed for > > your current purpose, but would add another strong motivation for this > > change... > > Adrian made a similar observation offline. What do you think about putting > that in the `CommandReturnObject`? This seems generally useful and that way > it's not tied to the callback.
That's a good idea. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125006 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
