JDevlieghere wrote: > If this result printing callback was also passed the command string (which it > has from just above where the callback is called) then this would also be an > easy way to do logging of command execution. That's not needed for your > current purpose, but would add another strong motivation for this change...
Adrian made a similar observation offline. What do you think about putting that in the `CommandReturnObject`? This seems generally useful and that way it's not tied to the callback. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125006 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
