adrian-prantl wrote:

> Yeah, I don’t disagree with that - and we’re at C++17 now already. Anyway, 
> requiring 10.12 from 2016 seems reasonable to me.

Especially since nobody needs to run LLDB locally in order to do debugging. If 
you really want to debug with the very latest LLDB on a 10 year old system, you 
can debug remotely.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117252
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to