mstorsjo wrote:

> When we decided to allow C++11 usage in lldb I think we opted into requiring 
> platforms that have relatively complete support for the C++11 additions. I 
> don't think it makes sense to try to limit the use of C++11 to some "minimal 
> supported subset".

Yeah, I don’t disagree with that - and we’re at C++17 now already. Anyway, 
requiring 10.12 from 2016 seems reasonable to me.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117252
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to