================
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+import lldb
+from lldbsuite.test.decorators import *
+from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import *
+from lldbsuite.test import lldbutil
+
+
+class LibCxxInternalsRecognizerTestCase(TestBase):
+ NO_DEBUG_INFO_TESTCASE = True
+
+ @add_test_categories(["libc++"])
+ def test_frame_recognizer(self):
+ """Test that implementation details of libc++ are hidden"""
+ self.build()
+ (target, process, thread, bkpt) = lldbutil.run_to_source_breakpoint(
+ self, "break here", lldb.SBFileSpec("main.cpp")
+ )
+
+ expected_parents = {
+ "sort_less(int, int)": ["::sort", "test_algorithms"],
+ # `std::ranges::sort` is implemented as an object of types
`__sort`.
----------------
frederick-vs-ja wrote:
There're a large number of such customization point objects (and niebloids,
which will be respecified as CPOs soon, see
[P3136R0](https://wg21.link/p3136r0)) since C++20. Should we invent some
convention to recognize them uniformly?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108870
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
