vogelsgesang wrote: > We really should add a "disable" to the frame recognizers
Merged #109219 > I wonder if a heuristic for the callback case could be: mark all but the > first libc++ entry point as an implementation detail. Would this be even more > aggressive? Also, the implementation of this might be a bit awkward. Not > sure. Wdyt? I combined your approach with the `__`-based heuristic. I am quite happy with the result. It's more robust now, as can be seen by the updated test expectations for `ranges::sort`: The top-level `std::__1::ranges::__sort::operator()` is no longer hidden https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108870 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
