zturner added a comment. Right, but I don't agree in this case that "different" has to mean "we discourage the use of reduced test cases". I have a hard time imagining a scenario where not having reduced test cases is an advantage. It's also easy to explain to people. "Write reduced test cases". It's easy to understand. Moreso than "Reduced test cases are good, but not always because fuzziness, but we can't really put into words exactly what amount of fuzziness we want, or what it should look like, so I guess anything goes
- don't ask don't tell". If we want fuzziness, we should do fuzz testing. Feature tests and regression tests should be reduced. The whole reason the tests in lldb/tests were written is because people were testing a specific feature or bugfix. I don't see a reason to add fuzziness to this kind of test. All it does is pollute failure logs. Fuzziness is better tested by fuzz tests. http://reviews.llvm.org/D16334 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
