tfiala added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D13124#255044, @zturner wrote:
> Yea, on Windows we can support core dump generation externally without > touching the python script, so that's not neded for us. Okay, good! > Ironically, at the system level there is a way to specify the return code > of the process when you terminate it. And Python internally must be using > this API, because it's the only way to do it. Hah, that's interesting. > They just decided not to > expose that parameter through the subprocess.terminate() method, and > instead they pass their own magic value. If someone is clever enough to > dig through python source code and figure out what value it uses, we could > use that. But I think on Windows it's safe to assume that if you call > process.terminate(), then it was a hard terminate, and we can ignore > everything else. > > Does that make sense / is easy to do? Yes, makes sense and yes I can accommodate by just making that soft terminate level optional by platform. I'll get to working on that after lunch and I hope to have a patch up way before I head home today. http://reviews.llvm.org/D13124 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
