> It is about HTTPS, not HTTP.

Sorry, I missed this; I thought that you were referring primarily to HTTP.  My 
apologies.

I might end up adding this functionality sometime in the future.  But I’m 
curious: Does our existing RTSP server implementation support RTSP-over-HTTPS?  
When I recently added RTSP-over-TLS support to our RTSP server implementation, 
it wasn’t intended to also support RTSP-over-HTTPS.  But perhaps this is 
working by (happy) accident?  Or are you using some other RTSP server 
implementation to test your modified client?

Also, I don’t understand your first proposed patch (changing “fInputSocketNum” 
to “fOutputSocketNum” in a call to “getsockopt()”).  The connection handler 
function is clearly for handling *incoming* data, so it should always be on the 
input socket, not the output socket (on which we never receive data).


Ross Finlayson
Live Networks, Inc.
http://www.live555.com/


_______________________________________________
live-devel mailing list
live-devel@lists.live555.com
http://lists.live555.com/mailman/listinfo/live-devel

Reply via email to