>    i have the some problem too and i don't think the problem is caused by 
> vlc.  when I start multiple VLC players and have them playing the stream of a 
> ip camera source, it is working fine . if i start and play them for the 
> remote proxyServer, I will get a bad performance . i try to increase the 
> socket buffer size but could not fix it. i also use ffplay.exe to test 
> proxyServer, then i find some information maybe , the players' frame have a 
> serious time delay, and vlc always discard the delay frames so why we get the 
> bad performance .

Scalability problems like this are almost always caused by the combined bitrate 
of the multiple-unicast streams (from the proxy server) approaching or 
exceeding the capacity of your network.  (Note that when you had multiple VLC 
players playing a stream from an IP camera, that this was probably a 
*multicast* stream (because few network cameras support unicast streaming to 
more than one simultaneous client).  The proxy server, on the other hand, 
streams to each of its clients via unicast; if it has N concurrent clients, 
then the stream will be multiplied N times (not counting the additional stream 
that came from the back-end server).)

People tend to greatly overestimate the capacity of their LANs.  They may see a 
100 Mbps or 1 Gbps Ethernet interface on the back of their server computers, 
and assume that that’s the capacity of their LAN.  Usually not even close.  The 
actual capacity of a network depends on many factors, including OS and network 
interface buffering, virtualization (if any), network interface issues, the 
presence of routers (and even worse, firewalls).

In any case, I’m not planning on responding to any more reports like this 
unless they can also identify a specific problem with our software that might 
be responsible.


Ross Finlayson
Live Networks, Inc.
http://www.live555.com/

_______________________________________________
live-devel mailing list
live-devel@lists.live555.com
http://lists.live555.com/mailman/listinfo/live-devel

Reply via email to