Dino, Victor, all, > (4) How LISP was used at the Tokyo Olympics to monitor underlay telemetry for both unicast and multicast flows
I would love to "discuss" more on this one (on-line or offline or both). It is fascinating to have overlay assisting in underlay monitoring. > We should discuss the topic of backbone peerings and how those may be enforced in an overlay. Very interesting with few real use cases I can think of already. Very useful for triggering not only discussions but perhaps some real work to pop-out of this. Thx, R. On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 9:09 PM Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote: > I can give 4 (or less) use-case presentations at any length you see fit. > Maybe the group can decide how indepth for each one and that can dictate > the time slot. Here are the 3 use-cases: > > (1) How LISP is used to build a blockchain network > (2) How LISP is used for contact tracing > (3) How LISP was used at the PyeongChang Olympics to move data around > without touching the underlay > (4) How LISP was used at the Tokyo Olympics to monitor underlay telemetry > for both unicast and multicast flows > > But I would like to hear from others. I think we should copy the rtgwg, > dmm, coinrg, and dinrg. But I'll wait for others to comment before doing so. > > WG, whatdayathink? > > Dino > > > On Aug 24, 2021, at 2:32 AM, Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > that is not a bad idea. > > > > So let’s start: What are the topics people want to talk about during the > next meeting? > > > > Ciao > > > > L. > > > > > >> On 12 Aug 2021, at 23:59, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Let's collectively make a list of topics that we can have a > 1/2-hour-to-1-hour slot to discuss. I am sure many people want to talk > about various topics. And from that discussion, we can create action items. > >> > >> And I think we should open the list creation to other WGs that may look > at LISP to help solve some of their problems. And even if the topics are > tutorial in nature, that will foster discussion IMO. > >> > >> Dino > >> > >>> On Aug 12, 2021, at 2:49 PM, Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Your chairs have until September 24th to request a slot at the next > meeting. Participants indicated a desire for a 2 hour slot. Before > requesting that, I at least (I have not asked Luigi) want evidence tha > there will be actual discussion. Burning two hours for presentations that > do not lead to discussion is a waste of scarce meeting time. > >>> > >>> The best evidence I know of is actual discussion on list, leading to > identified open issues to be discussed. > >>> > >>> Yours, > >>> Joel > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> lisp mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> lisp mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp > > > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp >
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
