It wounds like we are going for very different goals. Those are all
very impressive uses (except I don't care about blockchains...)
But from my perspective, what I am looking for is presentations that
will cause discussion in the meeting, leading to benefit for the working
group. This is not a conference for talking aobut the impressive things
we have accomplished (even if I grant they are impressive and useful.)
So the question really for the working group is "what things do you
think it is worth discussing. Not listening to. Discussing.
Yours,
Joel
On 8/24/2021 3:08 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
I can give 4 (or less) use-case presentations at any length you see fit. Maybe
the group can decide how indepth for each one and that can dictate the time
slot. Here are the 3 use-cases:
(1) How LISP is used to build a blockchain network
(2) How LISP is used for contact tracing
(3) How LISP was used at the PyeongChang Olympics to move data around without
touching the underlay
(4) How LISP was used at the Tokyo Olympics to monitor underlay telemetry for
both unicast and multicast flows
But I would like to hear from others. I think we should copy the rtgwg, dmm,
coinrg, and dinrg. But I'll wait for others to comment before doing so.
WG, whatdayathink?
Dino
On Aug 24, 2021, at 2:32 AM, Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
that is not a bad idea.
So let’s start: What are the topics people want to talk about during the next
meeting?
Ciao
L.
On 12 Aug 2021, at 23:59, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote:
Let's collectively make a list of topics that we can have a 1/2-hour-to-1-hour
slot to discuss. I am sure many people want to talk about various topics. And
from that discussion, we can create action items.
And I think we should open the list creation to other WGs that may look at LISP
to help solve some of their problems. And even if the topics are tutorial in
nature, that will foster discussion IMO.
Dino
On Aug 12, 2021, at 2:49 PM, Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]> wrote:
Your chairs have until September 24th to request a slot at the next meeting.
Participants indicated a desire for a 2 hour slot. Before requesting that, I
at least (I have not asked Luigi) want evidence tha there will be actual
discussion. Burning two hours for presentations that do not lead to discussion
is a waste of scarce meeting time.
The best evidence I know of is actual discussion on list, leading to identified
open issues to be discussed.
Yours,
Joel
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
