> Many of the things that I believe folks would like to discuss are in charter. > Dino, I think you misunderstood my point.
I understood the point. But if people don’t get the opportunity to present, then there isn’t much to discuss. If members want to discuss anything they feel is important, they can always bring that up on the list. So there is nothing special about a virtual meeting that would warrant discussion. But if there are presenters, then we should have a virtual meeting. > I am looking to see discussion on the list to give me confidence that a > virtual session will be useful. I have been It will be useful if there are presenters. > disappointed in the one-way nature of the last several working group > meetings, and do not wish to waste a virtual meeting on such. It is less waste than having a physical meeting. There was one-way nature in the last working group? Can you be more specific? I saw discussion at the mic. Dino _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
