Hi, I'm a novice and I don't understand what is "IIRC". Is something that handles the two FECs on 885ads? I knew that on 885ads the second ethernet was realized via an SCC and not FEC. Am I wrong?
Bye, Antonio. Vitaly Bordug Scrive: > On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 15:37:16 GMT > "antonio.dibacco" <antonio.dibacco at aruba.it> wrote: > >> I think I will use the 8xx_immap.h borrowed from u-boot-1.1.4, it is really >> similar to that of 2.4.25, with some explicit padding and fec2. Do you think >> that porting fs_enet to 2.4 is it the best way to have both FECs working on >> a MPC875? I don't want to use 2.6. >> > Sounds reasonable, but I'll repeat: > fs_enet patches for 2.6 used to support 2.4 thing(via #ifdef's), it was > cleaned up close to submission. IIRC, it handles 2 fecs quite great on my > 885ads, so it worths to search around a bit before hacking... > >> Bye, >> Antonio. >> >> Vitaly Bordug Scrive: >> >> > On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 13:15:00 GMT >> > "antonio.dibacco" <antonio.dibacco at aruba.it> wrote: >> > >> >> I think that to make it work I need to update cpm8xx_t inserting the fec2 >> >> filed. Is this true? Could I use the 8xx_immap.h of a 2.6 kernel? >> >> >> > Not exactly. I think you can borrow the structures from 2.6, but do a >> > triple-check that the result offsets are the same. >> > >> >> Bye, >> >> Antonio. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list >> >> Linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org >> >> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Sincerely, >> > Vitaly >> >> >> > > > -- > Sincerely, > Vitaly
