On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 15:37:16 GMT "antonio.dibacco" <antonio.dibacco at aruba.it> wrote:
> I think I will use the 8xx_immap.h borrowed from u-boot-1.1.4, it is really > similar to that of 2.4.25, with some explicit padding and fec2. Do you think > that porting fs_enet to 2.4 is it the best way to have both FECs working on > a MPC875? I don't want to use 2.6. > Sounds reasonable, but I'll repeat: fs_enet patches for 2.6 used to support 2.4 thing(via #ifdef's), it was cleaned up close to submission. IIRC, it handles 2 fecs quite great on my 885ads, so it worths to search around a bit before hacking... > Bye, > Antonio. > > Vitaly Bordug Scrive: > > > On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 13:15:00 GMT > > "antonio.dibacco" <antonio.dibacco at aruba.it> wrote: > > > >> I think that to make it work I need to update cpm8xx_t inserting the fec2 > >> filed. Is this true? Could I use the 8xx_immap.h of a 2.6 kernel? > >> > > Not exactly. I think you can borrow the structures from 2.6, but do a > > triple-check that the result offsets are the same. > > > >> Bye, > >> Antonio. > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list > >> Linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org > >> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Sincerely, > > Vitaly > > > -- Sincerely, Vitaly
