Hi, On 27/05/2021 14:10:35+0200, Roman Beranek wrote: > Hello Thierry, > > On Tue May 25, 2021 at 6:41 PM CEST, Thierry Reding wrote: > > I'm pretty sure Alexandre at the time reported that the instantiation of > > the controller that he was using required waiting for the period to > > complete before the output went to the disabled state. It's possible > > that this was changed in subsequent versions of the IP, so perhaps we > > need to distinguish based on compatible string? >
I can't recall what I tested exactly. I probably assumed it would take the whole period to update because this is how it is working on v1 of the atmel PWM and this is what I was working on at the time. I did test on a CHIP. I guess linux-sunxi.org is more correct than I was at the time. > I've got myself an A10 (sun4i) board to test my new patchset with and > indeed the 2 cycles seem to be enough. > > I have yet to write a cover letter for it though, expect it by Monday > at the latest. > > Best regards, > Roman -- Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/linux-sunxi/YK%2BkbJIvx7mVNDCE%40piout.net.
