On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Irgendeiner <[email protected]> wrote: > From many years of experience I got convinced that an aggressive style by > itself always results in a less productive situation, eventually even in a > deadlock. > > Someone either has the power and money to convince the other party that it > will lose a legal battle in _very near_ future. If you lack power and money > you better seek cooperation. > > If anybody can convince FSF or softwarefreedom.org to contact Allwinner, > then there is a chance that they will comply. > > Trying to organize a boycott of Allwinner products shows lack of > understanding how these markets operate.
I think you capture my thoughts quite well. In terms of strategy, it does not make any sense to have aggression among members of your very own side. It is weird to follow a strategy of attack against your own side because you want to follow a specific direction that aims to benefit anyway that side that you are attacking. It is so sad that if the companies ignore you altogether, then developers do not attack them. You make an effort to get a company to talk, and a s***storm ensues. Simos -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
