Hi Vineet,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vineet Gupta <vgu...@synopsys.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 8:38 PM
> To: Eugeniy Paltsev <palt...@synopsys.com>
> Cc: palt...@snyopsys.com; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Alexey Brodkin 
> <abrod...@synopsys.com>; linux-
> snps-...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] ARC: mm: do_page_fault refactor #3: tidyup vma 
> access permission code
> 
> On 5/16/19 10:24 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> >> +  unsigned int write = 0, exec = 0, mask;
> > Probably it's better to use 'bool' type for 'write' and 'exec' as we really 
> > use them as a boolean
> variables.
> 
> Right those are semantics, but the generated code for "bool" is not ideal - 
> given
> it is inherently a "char" it is promoted first to an int with an additional 
> EXTB
> which I really dislike.
> Guess it is more of a style thing.

In that sense maybe think about re-definition of "bool" type to 32-bit one
for entire architecture and get that benefit across the entire source tree?

-Alexey

Reply via email to