Invert the condition for stack expansion.
No functional change

Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgu...@synopsys.com>
---
 arch/arc/mm/fault.c | 12 +++++-------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arc/mm/fault.c b/arch/arc/mm/fault.c
index 6836095251ed..94d242740ac5 100644
--- a/arch/arc/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/arc/mm/fault.c
@@ -100,21 +100,19 @@ void do_page_fault(unsigned long address, struct pt_regs 
*regs)
                flags |= FAULT_FLAG_USER;
 retry:
        down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+
        vma = find_vma(mm, address);
        if (!vma)
                goto bad_area;
-       if (vma->vm_start <= address)
-               goto good_area;
-       if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_GROWSDOWN))
-               goto bad_area;
-       if (expand_stack(vma, address))
-               goto bad_area;
+       if (unlikely(address < vma->vm_start)) {
+               if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_GROWSDOWN) || expand_stack(vma, 
address))
+                       goto bad_area;
+       }
 
        /*
         * Ok, we have a good vm_area for this memory access, so
         * we can handle it..
         */
-good_area:
        si_code = SEGV_ACCERR;
 
        /* Handle protection violation, execute on heap or stack */
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc

Reply via email to