On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 01:57:05PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> On 11/01/2016 01:42 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > Please stay consistent with the rest of the Kconfig.
> > 
> > config ARC_TIMER_RTC
> >     bool "64-bit cycle counter in HS38 cores" if COMPILE_TEST
> >     select CLKSRC_OF
> >     help
> >       This counter provides 64-bit resolution vs. the 32-bit TIMER1.
> >       It is implemented inside the core thus can't be used in SMP systems.
> > 
> > config ARC_TIMER_GFRC
> >     bool "64-bit cycle counter in ARConnect block in HS38x cores" if 
> > COMPILE_TEST
> >     select CLKSRC_OF
> >     help
> >       This counter can be used as clocksource in SMP HS38 SoCs.
> >       It sits outside the core thus can be used in SMP systems
> > 
> 
> Yes I did so already :-) Although I also added a default y if ARC to both, 
> but as
> you say that is better done in ARC Kconfig.
> 
> > Then in the ARC's Kconfig you select ARC_TIMER_RTC or ARC_TIMER_GFRC 
> > depending
> > it is SMP or not.
> > 
> > One question:
> > 
> > Why ARC_TIMER_RTC can't be used in a SMP system ? Doesn't have each core its
> > own clocksource ? It seems you are assuming a clocksource can be used on SMP
> > only if the clocksource is unique and shared across the cores.
> 

As now the clksrc-probe is correctly handling the errors, if the rtc and the
gfrc are both defined in the DT, you can fail to init the rtc one with a simple
test in the init function:

        if (IS_DEFINED(CONFIG_SMP))
                return -EINVAL;

So, you can inconditionaly compile in both RTC and GFRC, no ? That would be
cleaner and prevent a different kernel config.

_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc

Reply via email to