On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 05:45:48PM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> +static void __clear_swapfile_extents(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> + u64 isize = inode->i_size;
> + struct extent_map *em;
> + u64 start, len;
> +
> + start = 0;
> + while (start < isize) {
> + len = isize - start;
> + em = btrfs_get_extent(inode, NULL, 0, start, len, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(em))
> + return;
This could transiently fail if there's no memory to allocate the em, and
would leak the following extents.
> +
> + clear_bit(EXTENT_FLAG_SWAPFILE, &em->flags);
> +
> + start = extent_map_end(em);
> + free_extent_map(em);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int btrfs_swap_activate(struct swap_info_struct *sis, struct file
> *file,
> + sector_t *span)
> +{
> + struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
> + struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = BTRFS_I(inode)->root->fs_info;
> + struct extent_io_tree *io_tree = &BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree;
> + int ret = 0;
> + u64 isize = inode->i_size;
> + struct extent_state *cached_state = NULL;
> + struct extent_map *em;
> + u64 start, len;
> +
> + if (BTRFS_I(inode)->flags & BTRFS_INODE_COMPRESS) {
> + /* Can't do direct I/O on a compressed file. */
> + btrfs_err(fs_info, "swapfile is compressed");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + if (!(BTRFS_I(inode)->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW)) {
> + /*
> + * Going through the copy-on-write path while swapping pages
> + * in/out and doing a bunch of allocations could stress the
> + * memory management code that got us there in the first place,
> + * and that's sure to be a bad time.
> + */
> + btrfs_err(fs_info, "swapfile is copy-on-write");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + lock_extent_bits(io_tree, 0, isize - 1, 0, &cached_state);
> +
> + /*
> + * All of the extents must be allocated and support direct I/O. Inline
> + * extents and compressed extents fall back to buffered I/O, so those
> + * are no good. Additionally, all of the extents must be safe for nocow.
> + */
> + atomic_inc(&BTRFS_I(inode)->root->nr_swapfiles);
> + start = 0;
> + while (start < isize) {
> + len = isize - start;
> + em = btrfs_get_extent(inode, NULL, 0, start, len, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(em)) {
IS_ERR_OR_NULL(em)
>From now on the em is valid and has to be free_extent_map()ed ...
> + ret = PTR_ERR(em);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + if (test_bit(EXTENT_FLAG_VACANCY, &em->flags) ||
> + em->block_start == EXTENT_MAP_HOLE) {
> + btrfs_err(fs_info, "swapfile has holes");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
... and all the error branches would miss it.
> + goto out;
> + }
> + if (em->block_start == EXTENT_MAP_INLINE) {
> + /*
> + * It's unlikely we'll ever actually find ourselves
> + * here, as a file small enough to fit inline won't be
> + * big enough to store more than the swap header, but in
> + * case something changes in the future, let's catch it
> + * here rather than later.
> + */
> + btrfs_err(fs_info, "swapfile is inline");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
here
> + goto out;
> + }
> + if (test_bit(EXTENT_FLAG_COMPRESSED, &em->flags)) {
> + btrfs_err(fs_info, "swapfile is compresed");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
here
> + goto out;
> + }
> + ret = can_nocow_extent(inode, start, &len, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> + if (ret < 0) {
here
> + goto out;
> + } else if (ret == 1) {
> + ret = 0;
> + } else {
> + btrfs_err(fs_info, "swapfile has extent requiring COW
> (%llu-%llu)",
> + start, start + len - 1);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
here
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + set_bit(EXTENT_FLAG_SWAPFILE, &em->flags);
> +
> + start = extent_map_end(em);
> + free_extent_map(em);
> + }
> +
> +out:
> + if (ret) {
should be fixed by:
if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(em))
free_extent_map(em);
> + __clear_swapfile_extents(inode);
> + atomic_dec(&BTRFS_I(inode)->root->nr_swapfiles);
> + }
> + unlock_extent_cached(io_tree, 0, isize - 1, &cached_state, GFP_NOFS);
> + return ret;
> +}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
