On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 11:02:09AM +0200, Thomas Schoebel-Theuer wrote: > > Maintaining out of tree code is not our problem, sorry. thanks, greg k-h > > OK, I just noticed that in the meantime many vfs_*() are present now > which were missing when I started the project on very old kernels (or > maybe I missed something, sorry for any potential mistakes). > > So I will happily make a new version which has the lowest possible > footprint in the kernel, but nevertheless is _internally_ portable (just > for me and the needs of 1&1 users). > > This will incur many changes in many places in the patchset. Is it OK to > re-submit the _whole_ patchset again after that?
Given that your patchset really isn't even in a reviewable format (you just add one file per-patch) resending it doesn't bother anyone :) Hint, you will have to work on a better way to submit this code in a format that is mergable. It's a non-trivial task, but going to be required if you wish for this to ever be accepted. Best of luck, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
