> Maintaining out of tree code is not our problem, sorry. thanks, greg k-h
OK, I just noticed that in the meantime many vfs_*() are present now which were missing when I started the project on very old kernels (or maybe I missed something, sorry for any potential mistakes). So I will happily make a new version which has the lowest possible footprint in the kernel, but nevertheless is _internally_ portable (just for me and the needs of 1&1 users). This will incur many changes in many places in the patchset. Is it OK to re-submit the _whole_ patchset again after that? I will have to re-run the full testsuite on the new version in order to be sure that no bad things happen, so this will take at least 24h (if not several days). Cheers, Thomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
