Hi,
On 04/09/2014 12:30 PM, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> From: Kefeng Wang <[email protected]>
>
> The hip04 SoC of hisilicon has an AHCI compliant SATA controller,
> and it is compliant with the ahci 1.3 and sata 3.0 specification.
>
> There is a wrong bit in HOST_CAP of hip04 sata controller, which
> enable unsupported feature of FBS, use AHCI_HFLAG_NO_FBS hflag to
> disable it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.txt | 3 +-
> drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c | 65
> +++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.txt
> index 48b285f..aab1d70 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.txt
> @@ -7,7 +7,8 @@ Required properties:
> - compatible : compatible list, one of "snps,spear-ahci",
> "snps,exynos5440-ahci", "ibm,476gtr-ahci",
> "allwinner,sun4i-a10-ahci", "fsl,imx53-ahci"
> - "fsl,imx6q-ahci" or "snps,dwc-ahci"
> + "fsl,imx6q-ahci", "snps,dwc-ahci" or
> + "hisilicon,hisi-ahci"
> - interrupts : <interrupt mapping for SATA IRQ>
> - reg : <registers mapping>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> index ef67e79..9581d51 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> @@ -17,22 +17,61 @@
> #include <linux/pm.h>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> #include <linux/libata.h>
> #include <linux/ahci_platform.h>
> #include "ahci.h"
>
> -static const struct ata_port_info ahci_port_info = {
> - .flags = AHCI_FLAG_COMMON,
> - .pio_mask = ATA_PIO4,
> - .udma_mask = ATA_UDMA6,
> - .port_ops = &ahci_platform_ops,
> +enum ahci_type {
> + AHCI, /* standard platform ahci */
> + HIP04_AHCI, /* ahci on HiP04 */
> };
>
> +static const struct ata_port_info ahci_port_info[] = {
> + [AHCI] = {
> + .flags = AHCI_FLAG_COMMON,
> + .pio_mask = ATA_PIO4,
> + .udma_mask = ATA_UDMA6,
> + .port_ops = &ahci_platform_ops,
> + },
> + [HIP04_AHCI] = {
> + AHCI_HFLAGS (AHCI_HFLAG_NO_FBS),
> + .flags = AHCI_FLAG_COMMON,
> + .pio_mask = ATA_PIO4,
> + .udma_mask = ATA_UDMA6,
> + .port_ops = &ahci_platform_ops,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id ahci_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "snps,spear-ahci", },
> + { .compatible = "snps,exynos5440-ahci", },
> + { .compatible = "ibm,476gtr-ahci", },
> + { .compatible = "snps,dwc-ahci", },
> + { .compatible = "hisilicon,hisi-ahci", .data = (void *)HIP04_AHCI, },
> + {},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ahci_of_match);
> +
> +static int ahci_match_of_id(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + enum ahci_type *ahci_type)
> +{
> + const struct of_device_id *of_id = of_match_device(ahci_of_match,
> + &pdev->dev);
> + if (!of_id)
> + return -ENODEV;
> + *ahci_type = (unsigned long)(of_id->data);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
Hmm, it would be a lot cleaner to not do all of the above, and then
... (continued below).
> static int ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct ahci_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
> struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv;
> + struct ata_port_info pi;
> + enum ahci_type ahci_type;
> int rc;
>
> hpriv = ahci_platform_get_resources(pdev);
Replace the 2 new lines here with:
struct ata_port_info pi = ahci_port_info;
and ...
> @@ -55,7 +94,12 @@ static int ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto disable_resources;
> }
>
> - rc = ahci_platform_init_host(pdev, hpriv, &ahci_port_info, 0, 0);
> + if (!ahci_match_of_id(pdev, &ahci_type))
> + pi = ahci_port_info[ahci_type];
> + else
> + pi = ahci_port_info[AHCI];
> +
> + rc = ahci_platform_init_host(pdev, hpriv, &pi, 0, 0);
> if (rc)
> goto pdata_exit;
>
Replace the above with:
if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node, "hisilicon,hisi-ahci"))
pi.private_data = (void *)AHCI_HFLAG_NO_FBS;
rc = ahci_platform_init_host(pdev, hpriv, &pi, 0, 0);
Note we should consider giving ahci_platform_init_host a hflags argument to
avoid
having struct ata_port_info on the stack twice, once in ahci_probe and once in
ahci_platform_init_host.
> @@ -71,15 +115,6 @@ disable_resources:
> static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(ahci_pm_ops, ahci_platform_suspend,
> ahci_platform_resume);
>
> -static const struct of_device_id ahci_of_match[] = {
> - { .compatible = "snps,spear-ahci", },
> - { .compatible = "snps,exynos5440-ahci", },
> - { .compatible = "ibm,476gtr-ahci", },
> - { .compatible = "snps,dwc-ahci", },
> - {},
> -};
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ahci_of_match);
> -
> static struct platform_driver ahci_driver = {
> .probe = ahci_probe,
> .remove = ata_platform_remove_one,
>
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
