On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:31:59PM +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote: > > Anyway, perf_event_intel.c lists: 60,63,69,70,71 as being haswell > > clients. Andi did all that, so if its wrong its on Intel anyway. > > > What he has is okay for core. They all have the same core PMU at 99%. > But the uncore can be radically different. Look at IVB (58) vs IVB-EP (62). > So this is more risky there. That is why I did not add the other model > numbers.
Well, if any of those is a !client part; then still his fault for not putting in a comment. What's the worst that can happen? Failing to find the hardware I suppose seeing as this is all discoverable PCI space? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
