On 01/24/2014 07:01 AM, Dave Hansen wrote: > There are two failure modes I'm seeing: one when (failing to) allocate > the first node's mem_map[], and a second where it oopses accessing the > numa_distance[] table. This is the numa_distance[] one, and it happens > even with the patch you suggested applied.
And with my second (lots of debugging enabled) config, I get the mem_map[] oops. In other words, none of the reverts or patches are helping either of the conditions that I'm able to trigger. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
