On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 06:08:16PM +0800, chai wen wrote:
> On 10/10/2013 11:15 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 09:20:15PM +0800, chai wen wrote:
> >> Hi Gleb
> >>
> >> Thanks for you explanation about async_pf in kvm.
> >> Page pinning is not mandatory in kvm async_pf processing and probably 
> >> should
> >> be dropped later.this patch drops the FOLL_GET flag when doing GUP in 
> >> async_pf
> >> and uses a bool (marking result of GUP) to replace the *page in 
> >> kvm_async_pf
> >> structure to simplify some following async_pf check/clear processing.
> > Thanks, but the patch need to be on top of
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git queue branch.
> >
> > Some more comment bellow.
> >
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> Suggested-by:  [email protected]
> >> Signed-off-by: chai wen <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c       |    5 ++---
> >>  include/linux/kvm_host.h |    2 +-
> >>  virt/kvm/async_pf.c      |   16 ++++++----------
> >>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> >> index e5ca72a..0ff7d02 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> >> @@ -7282,8 +7282,7 @@ void kvm_arch_async_page_ready(struct kvm_vcpu 
> >> *vcpu, struct kvm_async_pf *work)
> >>  {
> >>    int r;
> >>  
> >> -  if ((vcpu->arch.mmu.direct_map != work->arch.direct_map) ||
> >> -        is_error_page(work->page))
> >> +  if ((vcpu->arch.mmu.direct_map != work->arch.direct_map))
> >>            return;
> >>  
> >>    r = kvm_mmu_reload(vcpu);
> >> @@ -7393,7 +7392,7 @@ void kvm_arch_async_page_present(struct kvm_vcpu 
> >> *vcpu,
> >>    struct x86_exception fault;
> >>  
> >>    trace_kvm_async_pf_ready(work->arch.token, work->gva);
> >> -  if (is_error_page(work->page))
> >> +  if (!work->got_page)
> >>            work->arch.token = ~0; /* broadcast wakeup */
> >>    else
> >>            kvm_del_async_pf_gfn(vcpu, work->arch.gfn);
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> >> index 0fbbc7a..232a7d0 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> >> @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ struct kvm_async_pf {
> >>    gva_t gva;
> >>    unsigned long addr;
> >>    struct kvm_arch_async_pf arch;
> >> -  struct page *page;
> >> +  bool got_page;
> > I would call it wakeup_all.
> >
> >>    bool done;
> >>  };
> >>  
> >> diff --git a/virt/kvm/async_pf.c b/virt/kvm/async_pf.c
> >> index 8a39dda..0cafdc7 100644
> >> --- a/virt/kvm/async_pf.c
> >> +++ b/virt/kvm/async_pf.c
> >> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ void kvm_async_pf_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >>  
> >>  static void async_pf_execute(struct work_struct *work)
> >>  {
> >> -  struct page *page = NULL;
> >> +  long nrpages = 0;
> >>    struct kvm_async_pf *apf =
> >>            container_of(work, struct kvm_async_pf, work);
> >>    struct mm_struct *mm = apf->mm;
> >> @@ -68,13 +68,13 @@ static void async_pf_execute(struct work_struct *work)
> >>  
> >>    use_mm(mm);
> >>    down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> >> -  get_user_pages(current, mm, addr, 1, 1, 0, &page, NULL);
> >> +  nrpages = get_user_pages(current, mm, addr, 1, 1, 0, NULL, NULL);
> >>    up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> >>    unuse_mm(mm);
> >>  
> >>    spin_lock(&vcpu->async_pf.lock);
> >>    list_add_tail(&apf->link, &vcpu->async_pf.done);
> >> -  apf->page = page;
> >> +  apf->got_page = (1==nrpages);
> > Space before and after ==, but this is not needed at all.  It does
> > not matter if GUP failed or not here. We need to wake up guest process
> > that is waiting on a page, so just set wakeup_all to false in 
> > kvm_setup_async_pf().
> Hi Gleb
> Thanks for you reply.
> It does not matter if GUP failed or not here. But in the original logic of
> kvm_arch_async_page_ready and kvm_arch_async_page_present, there is
> is_error_page
> checking in them. I am not sure wheher this ‘logic’ should be dropped.
> And in kvm_async_pf_wakeup_all we used a dummy bad page pointer to generate
> boradcast wakeup before. if wakeup_all(bool) is marking the result of
> gup should it be false in this function ?
> 
is_error_page() does not consider NULL as error value.

> thanks
> >
> >>    apf->done = true;
> >>    spin_unlock(&vcpu->async_pf.lock);
> >>  
> >> @@ -114,8 +114,6 @@ void kvm_clear_async_pf_completion_queue(struct 
> >> kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >>                    list_entry(vcpu->async_pf.done.next,
> >>                               typeof(*work), link);
> >>            list_del(&work->link);
> >> -          if (!is_error_page(work->page))
> >> -                  kvm_release_page_clean(work->page);
> >>            kmem_cache_free(async_pf_cache, work);
> >>    }
> >>    spin_unlock(&vcpu->async_pf.lock);
> >> @@ -135,14 +133,12 @@ void kvm_check_async_pf_completion(struct kvm_vcpu 
> >> *vcpu)
> >>            list_del(&work->link);
> >>            spin_unlock(&vcpu->async_pf.lock);
> >>  
> >> -          if (work->page)
> >> +          if (work->got_page)
> >>                    kvm_arch_async_page_ready(vcpu, work);
> >>            kvm_arch_async_page_present(vcpu, work);
> >>  
> >>            list_del(&work->queue);
> >>            vcpu->async_pf.queued--;
> >> -          if (!is_error_page(work->page))
> >> -                  kvm_release_page_clean(work->page);
> >>            kmem_cache_free(async_pf_cache, work);
> >>    }
> >>  }
> >> @@ -165,7 +161,7 @@ int kvm_setup_async_pf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t 
> >> gva, gfn_t gfn,
> >>    if (!work)
> >>            return 0;
> >>  
> >> -  work->page = NULL;
> >> +  work->got_page = false;
> > Sp here do:
> >     work->wakeup_all = false;
> >
> >>    work->done = false;
> >>    work->vcpu = vcpu;
> >>    work->gva = gva;
> >> @@ -206,7 +202,7 @@ int kvm_async_pf_wakeup_all(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >>    if (!work)
> >>            return -ENOMEM;
> >>  
> >> -  work->page = KVM_ERR_PTR_BAD_PAGE;
> >> +  work->got_page = false;
> > And here:
> >     work->wakeup_all = true;
> >>    INIT_LIST_HEAD(&work->queue); /* for list_del to work */
> >>  
> >>    spin_lock(&vcpu->async_pf.lock);
> >> -- 
> >> 1.7.1
> > --
> >                     Gleb.
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to [email protected]
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards
> 
> chai wen
> 

--
                        Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to