On Thursday, May 09, 2013 10:09:23 AM Guenter Roeck wrote: > The following patch series introduces a marker for power management functions > and data. This this marker, #ifdef CONFIG_PM and #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > can be removed from most of the code. This ensures that the conditional code > still compiles but is not included in the object file. > > As a side effect, drivers declaring struct dev_pm_ops unconditionally > get a bit smaller if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not configured. > > The first patch in the series introduces the marker, the following > two patches introduce the marker in two drivers to demonstrate its use. > > The patch series depends on the "PM: Add pm_ops_ptr() macro" patch > submitted by Jingoo Han.
What about CCing a PM core maintainer? Please see my reply to Alan Stern for my opinion. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
