2013-03-17 (일), 17:27 +0900, Namjae Jeon: > From: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]> > > In function check_nid_range, there is no need to trigger BUG_ON and make > kernel stop. > Instead it could just check and indicate the inode number to be EINVAL. > Update the return path in do_read_inode to use the return from > check_nid_range. > > Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Amit Sahrawat <[email protected]> > --- > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 6 ++++-- > fs/f2fs/inode.c | 6 +++++- > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > index be7ae70..1dae921 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > @@ -515,9 +515,11 @@ static inline void mutex_unlock_op(struct f2fs_sb_info > *sbi, enum lock_type t) > /* > * Check whether the given nid is within node id range. > */ > -static inline void check_nid_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid) > +static inline int check_nid_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid) > { > - BUG_ON((nid >= NM_I(sbi)->max_nid)); > + if (nid >= NM_I(sbi)->max_nid) > + return -EINVAL; > + return 0;
At this moment, I'd like to apply this patch and remain BUG_ON together
since we should find real bugs in f2fs.
How do you think?
> }
>
> #define F2FS_DEFAULT_ALLOCATED_BLOCKS 1
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> index ddae412..6d82020 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,11 @@ static int do_read_inode(struct inode *inode)
> struct f2fs_inode *ri;
>
> /* Check if ino is within scope */
> - check_nid_range(sbi, inode->i_ino);
> + if (check_nid_range(sbi, inode->i_ino)) {
> + f2fs_msg(inode->i_sb, KERN_ERR, "bad inode number: %lu",
> + (unsigned long) inode->i_ino);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> node_page = get_node_page(sbi, inode->i_ino);
> if (IS_ERR(node_page))
--
Jaegeuk Kim
Samsung
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

