On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 02:19:22PM +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
> As new context tracking subsystem added, it seems ignore_user_qs and
> in_user defined in struct rcu_dynticks are no longer needed, so remove
> them. 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <[email protected]>

Hearing no objections from  Frederic, I have queued this patch for 3.9

                                                        Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  kernel/rcutree.c | 3 ---
>  kernel/rcutree.h | 4 ----
>  2 files changed, 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> index e441b77..b8fae5d 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> @@ -2719,9 +2719,6 @@ rcu_boot_init_percpu_data(int cpu, struct rcu_state 
> *rsp)
>       rdp->dynticks = &per_cpu(rcu_dynticks, cpu);
>       WARN_ON_ONCE(rdp->dynticks->dynticks_nesting != DYNTICK_TASK_EXIT_IDLE);
>       WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&rdp->dynticks->dynticks) != 1);
> -#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS
> -     WARN_ON_ONCE(rdp->dynticks->in_user);
> -#endif
>       rdp->cpu = cpu;
>       rdp->rsp = rsp;
>       rcu_boot_init_nocb_percpu_data(rdp);
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h
> index 4b69291..6f21f2e 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.h
> @@ -102,10 +102,6 @@ struct rcu_dynticks {
>                                   /* idle-period nonlazy_posted snapshot. */
>       int tick_nohz_enabled_snap; /* Previously seen value from sysfs. */
>  #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ */
> -#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS
> -     bool ignore_user_qs;        /* Treat userspace as extended QS or not */
> -     bool in_user;               /* Is the CPU in userland from RCU POV? */
> -#endif
>  };
> 
>  /* RCU's kthread states for tracing. */
> -- 
> 1.7.11.4
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to