* [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> The flush tlb optimization code has logical issue on UV
> platform. It doesn't flush the full range at all, since it
> simply ignores its 'end' parameter (and hence also the "all"
> indicator) in uv_flush_tlb_others() function.
In other words it's a user-space data corruptor showstopper bug
fix for the UV platform, which should get high tip:x86/urgent
priority, right?
It's generally useful to put such info right into the patch
title. 'fix issue' sounds a tad too harmless.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
