On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:59:54PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > if by 'custom' you mean the solution everyone agreed to work
> > toward at the power management summit several years ago
> > (hal/pm-utils) then, yes.
>
> I must have been on different summit... I believe it is bad to tie
> s2ram to hal, because it makes testing on minimal system hard.
>
> Anyway, what is the "default" way to trigger s2ram for Andrew? Perhaps
> Fedora already has his machine whitelisted...
There is no s2ram. pm-suspend uses the white/black-lists in pm-utils.
Remember that? The cross-distro package everyone agreed was a good idea
so that every distro didn't have their own magic utility ?
sigh, I give up.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
