De-couple load-balancing from the rb-trees, so that I can change their
organization. Afterwards we'll probably want to redo load balancing to
not need the grouping info.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/linux/init_task.h | 3 +++
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
kernel/sched.c | 12 ++++++++++--
kernel/sched_fair.c | 15 +++++++++------
4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/init_task.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/init_task.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/init_task.h
@@ -132,6 +132,9 @@ extern struct group_info init_groups;
.cpus_allowed = CPU_MASK_ALL, \
.mm = NULL, \
.active_mm = &init_mm, \
+ .se = { \
+ .group_node = LIST_HEAD_INIT(tsk.se.group_node), \
+ }, \
.rt = { \
.run_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(tsk.rt.run_list), \
.time_slice = HZ, \
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/sched.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -909,6 +909,7 @@ struct load_weight {
struct sched_entity {
struct load_weight load; /* for load-balancing */
struct rb_node run_node;
+ struct list_head group_node;
unsigned int on_rq;
u64 exec_start;
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -437,8 +437,12 @@ struct cfs_rq {
struct rb_root tasks_timeline;
struct rb_node *rb_leftmost;
- struct rb_node *rb_load_balance_curr;
- /* 'curr' points to currently running entity on this cfs_rq.
+
+ struct list_head tasks;
+ struct list_head *balance_iterator;
+
+ /*
+ * 'curr' points to currently running entity on this cfs_rq.
* It is set to NULL otherwise (i.e when none are currently running).
*/
struct sched_entity *curr;
@@ -2025,6 +2029,7 @@ static void __sched_fork(struct task_str
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->rt.run_list);
p->se.on_rq = 0;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->se.group_node);
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS
INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&p->preempt_notifiers);
@@ -7196,6 +7201,7 @@ int in_sched_functions(unsigned long add
static void init_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct rq *rq)
{
cfs_rq->tasks_timeline = RB_ROOT;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cfs_rq->tasks);
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
cfs_rq->rq = rq;
#endif
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -523,6 +523,7 @@ account_entity_enqueue(struct cfs_rq *cf
update_load_add(&cfs_rq->load, se->load.weight);
cfs_rq->nr_running++;
se->on_rq = 1;
+ list_add(&se->group_node, &cfs_rq->tasks);
}
static void
@@ -531,6 +532,7 @@ account_entity_dequeue(struct cfs_rq *cf
update_load_sub(&cfs_rq->load, se->load.weight);
cfs_rq->nr_running--;
se->on_rq = 0;
+ list_del_init(&se->group_node);
}
static void enqueue_sleeper(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
@@ -1156,16 +1158,17 @@ static void put_prev_task_fair(struct rq
* achieve that by always pre-iterating before returning
* the current task:
*/
+
static struct task_struct *
-__load_balance_iterator(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct rb_node *curr)
+__load_balance_iterator(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct list_head *next)
{
struct task_struct *p;
- if (!curr)
+ if (next == &cfs_rq->tasks)
return NULL;
- p = rb_entry(curr, struct task_struct, se.run_node);
- cfs_rq->rb_load_balance_curr = rb_next(curr);
+ p = list_entry(next, struct task_struct, se.group_node);
+ cfs_rq->balance_iterator = next->next;
return p;
}
@@ -1174,14 +1177,14 @@ static struct task_struct *load_balance_
{
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = arg;
- return __load_balance_iterator(cfs_rq, first_fair(cfs_rq));
+ return __load_balance_iterator(cfs_rq, cfs_rq->tasks.next);
}
static struct task_struct *load_balance_next_fair(void *arg)
{
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = arg;
- return __load_balance_iterator(cfs_rq, cfs_rq->rb_load_balance_curr);
+ return __load_balance_iterator(cfs_rq, cfs_rq->balance_iterator);
}
static unsigned long
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
