On Fri, Aug 28, 2026 at 12:23:42PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 06:27:45PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > power-domain-names: > > minItems: 2 > > - items: > > - - const: cx > > - - const: mx > > - - const: nsp > > + maxItems: 3 > > > > reg: > > maxItems: 1 > > @@ -104,15 +98,25 @@ allOf: > > then: > > properties: > > power-domains: > > - maxItems: 2 > > + items: > > + - description: CX power domain > > + - description: MX power domain > > power-domain-names: > > - maxItems: 2 > > + items: > > + - const: cx > > + - const: mx > > else: > > properties: > > power-domains: > > - minItems: 3 > > + items: > > + - description: CX power domain > > + - description: NMXC power domain > > + - description: NSP power domain > > power-domain-names: > > - minItems: 3 > > + items: > > + - const: cx > > + - const: nmxc > > That's the same domain from this device point of view, no? The names are > not representing provider but consumer.
Yes, you are right! The v2[1] was sent to drop the remoteproc changes. Shawn [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
