Hi Jens, On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 01:05:23PM +0200, Jens Remus wrote: > Hi Dylan and Mostafa!
I also work at the same company as Dylan and Mostafa, and am therefore probably using the same company-maintained Linux distribution. > On 5/18/2026 7:55 PM, Dylan Hatch wrote: > > On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 4:32 AM Mostafa Saleh <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Not sure if related, but after updating my toolchain > >> (aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 15.2.0-4) 15.2.0), I hit link errors: > >> ld.lld: error: arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday.o:(.sframe) is being > >> placed in '.sframe' > >> ld.lld: error: arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom.o:(.sframe) is being > >> placed in '.sframe` I've also been hitting this for some time, and I'd like to see if I can figure out what's going wrong. My current workaround is: --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -946,6 +946,8 @@ ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,--param=allow-store-data-races=0) KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-fno-allow-store-data-races) endif +# No sframe generation for kernel if enabled by default +KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-Xassembler --gsframe=no) ifdef CONFIG_READABLE_ASM # Disable optimizations that make assembler listings hard to read. > > Previously when developing against the SFrame V2 format, I had fixed > > these warnings with the VDSO Makefile change currently in this series: > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile > > b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile > > index 7dec05dd33b7..c60ef921956f 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile > > @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ ccflags-y += -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING -DBUILD_VDSO > > CC_FLAGS_REMOVE_VDSO := $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE) -Os $(CC_FLAGS_SCS) \ > > $(RANDSTRUCT_CFLAGS) $(KSTACK_ERASE_CFLAGS) \ > > $(GCC_PLUGINS_CFLAGS) \ > > - $(CC_FLAGS_LTO) $(CC_FLAGS_CFI) \ > > + $(CC_FLAGS_LTO) $(CC_FLAGS_CFI) $(CC_FLAGS_SFRAME) \ > > -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations > > > > CC_FLAGS_ADD_VDSO := -O2 -mcmodel=tiny -fasynchronous-unwind-tables > > > > But the warnings seem to have returned after upgrading my toolchain, > > possibly due to SFrame V3 or some confounding change in GCC. The > > --gsframe in the assembler should be set to 'no' by default, so > > perhaps GCC is providing an override --gsframe internally? > > Could it be that your build of binutils was configured with > --enable-default-sframe, so that the GNU assembler defaults to generate > .sframe? AFAIK this configure option was meant for distributors and > package maintainers. > > You can check as follows whether --gsframe defaults to "no" or "yes": > > $ as --help | grep -A1 gsframe > --gsframe[={no|yes}] whether to generate SFrame stack trace information > (default: no) > ... $ aarch64-linux-gnu-as --help | grep -A1 gsframe --gsframe[={no|yes}] whether to generate SFrame stack trace information (default: no) -- --gsframe-<N> generate SFrame version <N> information. 3 == <N> --scfi=experimental Synthesize DWARF CFI for hand-written asm > Maybe build the VDSO separately with V=1 to see what assembler/compiler > options are effectively used (e.g. for vgettimeofday.o and vgetrandom.o > mentioned in the linker error message above)? A slightly tweaked version of my vgetrandom.o build line: # CC arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom.o aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc -Wp,-MMD,arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/.vgetrandom.o.d -nostdinc -I./arch/arm64/include -I./arch/arm64/include/generated -I./include -I./include -I./arch/arm64/include/uapi -I./arch/arm64/include/generated/uapi -I./include/uapi -I./include/generated/uapi -include ./include/linux/compiler-version.h -include ./include/linux/kconfig.h -include ./include/linux/compiler_types.h -D__KERNEL__ -mlittle-endian -DCC_USING_PATCHABLE_FUNCTION_ENTRY -DKASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SHIFT= -Werror -fshort-wchar -funsigned-char -fno-common -fno-PIE -fno-strict-aliasing -std=gnu11 -fms-extensions -mgeneral-regs-only -DCONFIG_CC_HAS_K_CONSTRAINT=1 -Wno-psabi -mabi=lp64 -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-unwind-tables -mbranch-protection=pac-ret -Wa,-march=armv8.5-a -DARM64_ASM_ARCH='"armv8.5-a"' -DKASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SHIFT= -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -O2 -fno-allow-store-data-races -fstack-protector-strong -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero -fzero-init-padding-bits=all -fno-stack-clash-protection -fno-inline-functions-called-once -fmin-function-alignment=8 -fstrict-flex-arrays=3 -fno-strict-overflow -fno-stack-check -fconserve-stack -fno-builtin-wcslen -Wall -Wextra -Wundef -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -Werror=implicit-int -Werror=return-type -Werror=strict-prototypes -Wno-format-security -Wno-trigraphs -Wno-frame-address -Wno-address-of-packed-member -Wframe-larger-than=2048 -Wno-main -Wno-type-limits -Wno-dangling-pointer -Wvla-larger-than=1 -Wno-pointer-sign -Wcast-function-type -Wno-unterminated-string-initialization -Wno-array-bounds -Wno-stringop-overflow -Wno-alloc-size-larger-than -Wimplicit-fallthrough=5 -Werror=date-time -Werror=incompatible-pointer-types -Werror=designated-init -Wenum-conversion -Wunused -Wno-unused-but-set-variable -Wno-unused-const-variable -Wno-packed-not-aligned -Wno-format-overflow -Wno-format-truncation -Wno-stringop-truncation -Wno-override-init -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-shift-negative-value -Wno-maybe-uninitialized -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-unused-parameter -g -mstack-protector-guard=sysreg -mstack-protector-guard-reg=sp_el0 -mstack-protector-guard-offset=1344 -fno-common -fno-builtin -fno-stack-protector -ffixed-x18 -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING -DBUILD_VDSO -O2 -mcmodel=tiny -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -include ./lib/vdso/getrandom.c -I./arch/arm64/kernel/vdso -Iarch/arm64/kernel/vdso -DKBUILD_MODFILE='"arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom"' -DKBUILD_BASENAME='"vgetrandom"' -DKBUILD_MODNAME='"vgetrandom"' -D__KBUILD_MODNAME=vgetrandom -c -o arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom.o ./arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom.c I mostly don't know what I'm looking for w.r.t. gsframe features, but I'm willing to poke at my compiler/assembler/build-process. Brian
