On 04-24 07:31, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 24 Apr 2026 16:20:55 +0200 "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 4/24/26 16:15, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Fri, 24 Apr 2026 13:37:04 +0000 Pasha Tatashin > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> On 04-24 06:30, Andrew Morton wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Sashiko questions: > > >>> > > >>> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected] > > >>> > > >>> (I never know if my Sashiko emails are welcome/useful. Maybe Sashiko > > >>> said the same stuff about v9 and it's all wrong. But better safe than > > >>> sorry!) > > >> > > >> These emails are helpful; but, I do not believe you should have to > > >> manually follow up with a link to every new patch series. > > >> > > >> Perhaps Sashiko could automatically send a summary email in response to > > >> the cover letter, or provide a link once the reviews are complete. For > > >> the kexec ML, we opted-in with Roman to receive automated emails from > > >> sashiko. > > > > > > Yep. I'd be OK with an automatic reply-to-all. Maybe some won't like > > > that. > > > > > > An alternative I've discussed with Roman is an automated > > > reply-to-author with a cc to a dedicated list (we could use mm-commits > > > for now). > > > > > > Preferences? > > > > Reply-to-author would likely be better as a first step. > > Why do you think so? > > Pasha, is it too early to determine how reply-to-all is working out for > kexec?
It is too early, we have opted-in only at the end of last week. Pasha
