On Fri, 24 Apr 2026 16:20:55 +0200 "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 4/24/26 16:15, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Apr 2026 13:37:04 +0000 Pasha Tatashin > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 04-24 06:30, Andrew Morton wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> Sashiko questions: > >>> > >>> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected] > >>> > >>> (I never know if my Sashiko emails are welcome/useful. Maybe Sashiko > >>> said the same stuff about v9 and it's all wrong. But better safe than > >>> sorry!) > >> > >> These emails are helpful; but, I do not believe you should have to > >> manually follow up with a link to every new patch series. > >> > >> Perhaps Sashiko could automatically send a summary email in response to > >> the cover letter, or provide a link once the reviews are complete. For > >> the kexec ML, we opted-in with Roman to receive automated emails from > >> sashiko. > > > > Yep. I'd be OK with an automatic reply-to-all. Maybe some won't like > > that. > > > > An alternative I've discussed with Roman is an automated > > reply-to-author with a cc to a dedicated list (we could use mm-commits > > for now). > > > > Preferences? > > Reply-to-author would likely be better as a first step. Why do you think so? Pasha, is it too early to determine how reply-to-all is working out for kexec?
