Hi, Maybe the subject should say "um:" instead of "gcov:" now?
(I'm assuming you want us to apply it to uml tree.) > Prevent the bad combination by disabling UML's ARCH_HAS_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL > on 32-bit when using Clang 20.x or 21.x. You say 20.x or 21.x, > + # Clang 20 & 21 miscompute __builtin_object_size() under -fprofile-arcs > + # on 32-bit, causing spurious compile-time errors in check_copy_size(). > + select ARCH_HAS_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL if !(!64BIT && CLANG_VERSION >= 200000 > && CLANG_VERSION < 220100) and I see that 22.0 doesn't even exist, and maybe that's a general pattern, but it still looks confusing? Wouldn't it be better simpler to say < 220000? At least to me that more obviously is "up to 21.x". After all, 20.0 also didn't exist, and you did >=200000, not >200000 or >=200100? johannes
