On 3/18/26 12:33 AM, Alejandro Lucero Palau wrote:
>
> On 3/17/26 02:14, Dan Williams wrote:
>> Alejandro Lucero Palau wrote:
>> [..]
>>> This is not the first time I share my frustration, and as when I did so
>>> in the past, I want to finish with a positive last sentence: I will keep
>>> trying to get type2 support and hopefully further CXL stuff, and happy
>>> to discuss the best way to do so with the CXL kernel community.
>> I did not mean to imply that the type-2 set was stuck behind a new
>> dependency. Apologies.
>
>
> No worries.
>
>
>>
>> It is next in the queue, it needs to go in next cycle with a high
>> priority.
>>
>> In my view this confirmation that Smita's proposed patch addresses PJ's
>> test failure cleared one of the last hurdles for this set for me.
>
>
> Did PJ tell you so? From his report that seemed a likely reason, but he did
> not comment further after I told him about it.
>
PJ told me when I was talking to him WRT testing on the latest type2 series.
