On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 03:45:05PM -0300, Val Packett wrote: > > On 2/23/26 5:03 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 01, 2026 at 05:55:03PM -0300, Val Packett wrote: > > > The changes introduced to handle single power domain platforms have > > > swapped the info pointer increment from num_pd_vregs to num_pds, which > > > would shift the info pointer past the end of the array for pronto-v3, > > > which does not list power domain regulators in vregs. > > > > > > This showed up as a difference between GCC- and LLVM-compiled kernels > > > on SDM632 devices, where only with LLVM one would get the > > > "regulator request with no identifier" error, because the out-of-bounds > > > memory ended up being zeroed. Fix by skipping the increment when there > > > are more power domains than regulators. > > > > > Is the error only an error print, or did the thing stop working as well? > > It's a real error. Likely no one would've bothered debugging it if it > weren't breaking everything :) > > It was a blocker for allowing LLVM/clang builds of the msm8953 kernel in > postmarketOS, the whole reason to dig into this was "switching to clang > breaks the modem, WTF?!" >
Can you provide me with a Fixes: line please? Regards, Bjorn > ~val >
