Hello: This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>:
On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 20:40:37 +0800 you wrote: > From: Kaitao Cheng <[email protected]> > > When using bpf_kptr_xchg, we triggered the following error: > 31: (85) call bpf_kptr_xchg#194 > function calls are not allowed while holding a lock > bpf_kptr_xchg can now be used in lock-held contexts, so we extended > its usage scope in [patch 1/5]. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [RESEND,v7,1/5] bpf: allow calling bpf_kptr_xchg while holding a lock https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/964c0747686a - [RESEND,v7,2/5] bpf: allow using bpf_kptr_xchg even if the NON_OWN_REF flag is set https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/ee9886c40aae - [RESEND,v7,3/5] selftests/bpf: Add supplementary tests for bpf_kptr_xchg https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/580fa3430b5d - [RESEND,v7,4/5] bpf: allow using bpf_kptr_xchg even if the MEM_RCU flag is set https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/fb1590448ff7 - [RESEND,v7,5/5] selftests/bpf: Add test case for rbtree nodes that contain both bpf_refcount and kptr fields. https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/ed8fa4b8894f You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
