On 11/6/25 3:04 AM, Colin Ian King wrote:
There is a spelling mistake in an ASSERT_OK message. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xsk.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xsk.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xsk.c
index dd4c35c0e428..04f9a5e73e5e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xsk.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xsk.c
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static void test_xsk(const struct test_spec *test_to_run,
enum test_mode mode)
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(ifobj_rx, "create ifobj_rx"))
goto delete_tx;
- if (!ASSERT_OK(configure_ifobj(ifobj_tx, ifobj_rx), "conigure ifobj"))
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(configure_ifobj(ifobj_tx, ifobj_rx), "configure ifobj"))
Please squash with another typo fixes
(https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/)
into one single patch and use the "bpf-next" tag.
pw-bot: cr
goto delete_rx;
ret = get_hw_ring_size(ifobj_tx->ifname, &ifobj_tx->ring);
