On 11/11/25 10:50 AM, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> Currently if a user enqueues a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
> used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
> WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
> schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
> again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
>
> This lack of consistency cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.
>
> This continues the effort to refactor workqueue APIs, which began with
> the introduction of new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag in:
>
> commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
> commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")
>
> Switch to using system_dfl_wq, the new unbound workqueue, because the
> users do not benefit from a per-cpu workqueue.
>
> Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Petr Pavlu <[email protected]>
--
Thanks,
Petr
