damon_test_commit_filter() is assuming all dynamic memory allocation in
it will succeed.  Those are indeed likely in the real use cases since
those allocations are too small to fail, but theoretically those could
fail.  In the case, inappropriate memory access can happen.  Fix it by
appropriately cleanup pre-allocated memory and skip the execution of the
remaining tests in the failure cases.

Fixes: f6a4a150f1ec ("mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: add damos_commit_filter test")
Cc: <[email protected]> # 6.18.x
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <[email protected]>
---
 mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h | 15 ++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
index 03c7ac31db5c..5af8275ffd7d 100644
--- a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
+++ b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
@@ -516,11 +516,16 @@ static void damos_test_new_filter(struct kunit *test)
 
 static void damos_test_commit_filter(struct kunit *test)
 {
-       struct damos_filter *src_filter = damos_new_filter(
-               DAMOS_FILTER_TYPE_ANON, true, true);
-       struct damos_filter *dst_filter = damos_new_filter(
-               DAMOS_FILTER_TYPE_ACTIVE, false, false);
-
+       struct damos_filter *src_filter, *dst_filter;
+
+       src_filter = damos_new_filter(DAMOS_FILTER_TYPE_ANON, true, true);
+       if (!src_filter)
+               kunit_skip(test, "src filter alloc fail");
+       dst_filter = damos_new_filter(DAMOS_FILTER_TYPE_ACTIVE, false, false);
+       if (!dst_filter) {
+               damos_destroy_filter(src_filter);
+               kunit_skip(test, "dst filter alloc fail");
+       }
        damos_commit_filter(dst_filter, src_filter);
        KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, dst_filter->type, src_filter->type);
        KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, dst_filter->matching, src_filter->matching);
-- 
2.47.3

Reply via email to