On 28/10/2025 10:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 28/10/2025 11:24, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
On 28/10/2025 09:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
+ power-domain-names:
+ items:
+ - const: ife0
+ - const: ife1
+ - const: ife2
+ - const: top
Uh, not your fault, but who came with this list in previous generations?
Instead of simple and obvious "top+ifeX" which allows growing/shrinking,
someone put "top" at the end which means this cannot follow same order
as X1E for example... Heh, it follows at least sm8550.
Shall we put top as first power-domain? I don't think it's an issue to
change the order.
Well, it matches sm8550, so I am just grumpy complaining. It's fine.
The provenance here is "top" was required to be added last because the
code depended on magic indexing in dtb to know which was the TOP GDSC.
That's silly, because if it was first element would be much easier.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
I'm sure it was an accident. A bug, we fixed it.
Anyway that's why.
---
bod
