On 28/10/2025 11:24, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > On 28/10/2025 09:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>>> + power-domain-names: >>>>> + items: >>>>> + - const: ife0 >>>>> + - const: ife1 >>>>> + - const: ife2 >>>>> + - const: top >>>> Uh, not your fault, but who came with this list in previous generations? >>>> Instead of simple and obvious "top+ifeX" which allows growing/shrinking, >>>> someone put "top" at the end which means this cannot follow same order >>>> as X1E for example... Heh, it follows at least sm8550. >>> Shall we put top as first power-domain? I don't think it's an issue to >>> change the order. >> Well, it matches sm8550, so I am just grumpy complaining. It's fine. > > The provenance here is "top" was required to be added last because the > code depended on magic indexing in dtb to know which was the TOP GDSC.
That's silly, because if it was first element would be much easier. Best regards, Krzysztof
