On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 08:42:34AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 12:50 AM Jiayuan Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > > thanks, but version 1.30 didn't work in my tests - even pahole's master > > branch fails, only the next branch works... > >
> > It seems that the 'old' pahole parses some kfuncs incorrectly, for example > > bpf_dynptr_slice(). l > Alan, > the introduction of the 'next' branch screwed up the workflow for many people. > Let's remove it and merge everything into master. > People expect master branch to be the one where active development > is happening and the source of truth for the latest features. My bad, I've been away for too long, next is supposed to be with things for a short while, testing for a few days, for CI consumption, then move to master, rinse repeat. I think we should go back to that model. - Arnaldo
