On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 2:23 PM Yosry Ahmed <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 02:48:39PM -0700, Jim Mattson wrote:
> > Add a new VM mode, VM_MODE_PXXV57_4K, to support tests that require
> > 5-level paging on x86. This mode sets up a 57-bit virtual address
> > space and sets CR4.LA57 in the guest.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jim Mattson <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h  |  1 +
> >  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c    | 21 +++++++++++++++++
> >  .../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/processor.c | 23 ++++++++++++-------
> >  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/vmx.c     |  7 +++---
> >  4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > ...
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/vmx.c 
> > b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/vmx.c
> > index d4d1208dd023..1b6d4a007798 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/vmx.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/vmx.c
> > @@ -401,11 +401,12 @@ void __nested_pg_map(struct vmx_pages *vmx, struct 
> > kvm_vm *vm,
> >       struct eptPageTableEntry *pt = vmx->eptp_hva, *pte;
> >       uint16_t index;
> >
> > -     TEST_ASSERT(vm->mode == VM_MODE_PXXV48_4K, "Attempt to use "
> > -                 "unknown or unsupported guest mode, mode: 0x%x", 
> > vm->mode);
> > +     TEST_ASSERT(vm->mode == VM_MODE_PXXV48_4K ||
> > +                 vm->mode == VM_MODE_PXXV57_4K,
> > +                 "Unknown or unsupported guest mode: 0x%x", vm->mode);
> >
> >       TEST_ASSERT((nested_paddr >> 48) == 0,
> > -                 "Nested physical address 0x%lx requires 5-level paging",
> > +                 "Nested physical address 0x%lx is > 48-bits and requires 
> > 5-level EPT",
>
> Shouldn't this assertion be updated now? We technically support 5-level
> EPT so it should only fire if the mode is VM_MODE_PXXV48_4K. Maybe we
> should use vm->va_bits?

I did update the assertion! :)

init_vmcs_control_fields() hardcodes a page-walk-length of 4 in the
EPTP, and the loop in __nested_pg_map() counts down from
PG_LEVEL_512G. There is no support for 5-level EPT here.

>
> >                   nested_paddr);
> >       TEST_ASSERT((nested_paddr % page_size) == 0,
> >                   "Nested physical address not on page boundary,\n"
> > --
> > 2.51.0.470.ga7dc726c21-goog
> >
>

Reply via email to