On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 3:15 PM Maxime Coquelin
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/7/25 3:06 PM, Eugenio Pérez wrote:
> > Now that the virtio_net driver is able to recover from a stall
> > virtqueue, let's lift the restriction.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >   drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c | 3 ---
> >   1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c 
> > b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c
> > index e7bced0b5542..95d2b898171d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c
> > @@ -1726,9 +1726,6 @@ static bool features_is_valid(struct vduse_dev_config 
> > *config)
> >       if ((config->device_id == VIRTIO_ID_BLOCK) &&
> >                       (config->features & BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_BLK_F_CONFIG_WCE)))
> >               return false;
> > -     else if ((config->device_id == VIRTIO_ID_NET) &&
> > -                     (config->features & BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ)))
> > -             return false;
> >
> >       if ((config->device_id == VIRTIO_ID_NET) &&
> >                       !(config->features & BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)))
>
> I wonder whether the API version should be increased, otherwise I don't
> see how the app creating the VDUSE device knows whether it can safely
> advertises the CVQ support (except without doing trial and error).
>

Ok good point! I'll do it in the next version.


Reply via email to